Wednesday Colloquia
Single Molecule Magnets: Problems and Progress
by Prof. Prof. V. Chandrasekhar (Department of Chemistry, Indian Institute of Technology, Kanpur)
Wednesday, September 22, 2010
from
to
(Asia/Kolkata)
at Colaba Campus ( AG-66 )
at Colaba Campus ( AG-66 )
Description |
Single-molecule magnets (SMMs) are molecules that can be magnetized in a magnetic field and which. show slow relaxation when the magnetic field is removed. The magnetization occurs because there is a large energy barrier between the spin-up and the spin-down states. The magnetic order is within the molecules (single domain). The requirements for SMM behavior are (1) a very high spin state and (2) a large magnetic anisotropy. In contrast to classical nanomagnets obtained by a top-down approach SMMs represent a bottom-up approach. The potential applications of SMMs are vast. These include information processing, data storage, quantum computing, spintronics, biomedical applications (like MRI contrast agents) or magnetic refrigeration. One of the early compounds to have been studied as an SMM is the dodecanuclear mixed-valent manganese cage [MnIII/IV I2O12(CH3C02)16(H2O)4]1. This compound has an S=10 ground state and shows slow relaxation of the magnetization. Further, this compound shows hysteresis; evidence of quantum tunneling was also observed. Subsequently, several multinuclear transition metal complexes have been investigated for their SMM behavior. More recently there have been examples of3d-4fcomplexes that show SMM behavior. In this talk we will present various synthetic strategies that are useful for assembling compounds that can be potential SMMs. In general the requirement that SMMs should have large ground state spin values suggests that multinuclear transition metal/lanthanide/transition metal-lanthanide complexes should be prepared. The strategies for assembling such complexes can be varied and use of multi-topic ligands is usually practiced. In addition, a philosophical divergence in terms of strategy can arise with an approach allowing nature to pick the best possible ensemble from a reaction milieu. On the other hand, reliable architectures can be ensured by specific design of Iigands. The merits of these widely different methodologies will be presented with examples taken from the literature and from our work. References: 1. Sessoli, R.; Tsai, H.-L.; Schake, A. R.; Wang, S.; Vincent, J. B.; Folting, K.; Gatteschi, D.; Christou, G.; Hendrickson, D. N. J. Am. Chern. Soc. 1993, 115, 1804-16 2. Chandrasekhar, V.; Pandian, B. M.; Vittal, J. J.; Clerac, R. 1norg. Chern. 2009, 48, 1149-57 |
Organised by | Nitin Chaudhari |